|
|
June 30 This
evening, I lost my mobile phone. Not only that, I wasn't even aware of
the lost of my phone. About 3:00 in the morning, I received a phone
call from the guy who found it.
The
guy turned out to be a homeless guy that I had helped some time last
year. Although I haven't seen him since that time, I've often think of
him, wondering if he's ok.
Too
often, homeless people would either die from exposure or from being hit
by a passing car or from being attacked by mischievous teens. And
often, their death would occur without any notice from society. So,
after not seeing this guy for all this time, I had feared the worst and
hoped that we would at least meet again in heaven.
This
morning, the homeless guy, that I had been worrying about, stood before
me alive and doing well. (And he's got himself a little blue
scooter.) But this time, it's him helping me and not the other way
around.
I
don't know how to explain it but it was a perfect moment. The phone
that I had lost and not even aware was lost is returned. The man that
I had feared dead is alive. And he is no longer indebt to me for my
kindness; this morning, the exchange of kindness is complete.
That moment was like a glimpse of heaven. June 23 Someone started a thread in one of the Christian forum with the following:
Why is God a father?
In the bible it says that God is a father, but why? A mother can be just as good as a father.
Later in the thread, he posted the following:
God
is genderless, being that God is outside all of time and space that we
know it, and it's really our chosseing to rufur to God as anyway we
want. Even to be able to call God a goddess, and a mother, so I really
don't have any problem having chirstens call God a father. All I'm
doing is asking why christens ask call God father.
My
reply has two parts. First of all, we don't arbitrarily call God our
father instead of mother; we do so because we are commanded to do so.
Secondly, there's a reason that God commands us to do so.
The
Bible contains almost 170 references to God as the "Father"; about 900
verses use the word "theos"—a masculine noun in the Greek. However,
one would be hard pressed to find a single verse that refers to God as
the "Mother".
While, some people have argued that the use of the word "Father" is the result of a male dominated culture, I disagree.
Matthew 6:9 This, then, is how you should pray: 'Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name,
Jesus,
who is God incarnated, said that when we pray we are to address God as,
"Our Father who art in heaven." And that has nothing to do with
cultural context. It's an explicit imperative.
The
only way we can go around that one is to refute the accuracy of the
quotation in the gospels; and if you are disregard this part of the
scripture, then what's to stop you from disregarding any other part of
the scripture. And if every part of the scripture is suspect and we are
allow to pick and choose from the scripture as it suits us, then we
might as well just make it up as we go along.
See the slippery slope that we are sliding down?
So, why does God refers to Him self in the male gender?
In
the scripture, when God refers to Himself in the male gender, it is not
to be taken as a reference to physical features. God is spirit.
John 4:24 God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in spirit and in truth."
In fact, both men and women reflect the image of God.
Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.
God chose to refer to Himself in the male gender because it defines his role in his relationship with us.
Throughout
the Old and New Testament, God describes His role as the Bridegroom and
His people as His bride. He is the suitor pursuing His beloved, his
people. We, in our sin, do not pursue God; instead we give ourselves
to own self desires, our own "gods". It is because He pursues us that
we are able to repent (turn around) and see God as the only one worthy
of our worship. (e.g., See Solomon's Song of Songs)
God also describes His role as the husband who gave himself up for his wife to make her holy.
Ephesians 25-27 Husbands,
love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up
for her to make her holy, cleansing her by the washing with water
through the word, and to present her to himself as a radiant church,
without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless.
God's use of the male gender, to define his relationship with us, cuts to the heart of the Gospel. June 22 Someone started a new discussion thread in one of the Christian forums. Here is her post:
Do you believe the holy spirit is a free gift?
A lot of christiuan's believe you must recieve it via baptism or laying on the hands?
what do YOU guys think?
And, can you provide scripture?
Thanks! God Bless :)
Here is my response:
Acts 2:38 Peter
replied, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of
Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the
gift of the Holy Spirit.
While Acts 2:38 seems to say that if you are baptized, you will receive the Holy Spirit. That is not the case in Samaria:
Acts 8:14-17 When
the apostles in Jerusalem heard that Samaria had accepted the word of
God, they sent Peter and John to them. When they arrived, they prayed
for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit, because the Holy
Spirit had not yet come upon any of them; they had simply been baptized
into the name of the Lord Jesus. Then Peter and John placed their
hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit.
While
Acts 8:14-17 may lead one to believe that one receives the Holy Spirit
by the laying of hands, there were no laying of hands or baptism before
receiving the Holy Spirit in the case of Cornelius and his household:
Acts 10:30-48 Cornelius
answered: "Four days ago I was in my house praying at this hour, at
three in the afternoon. Suddenly a man in shining clothes stood before
me and said, 'Cornelius, God has heard your prayer and remembered your
gifts to the poor. Send to Joppa for Simon who is called Peter. He is a
guest in the home of Simon the tanner, who lives by the sea.' So I sent
for you immediately, and it was good of you to come. Now we are all
here in the presence of God to listen to everything the Lord has
commanded you to tell us."
Then
Peter began to speak: "I now realize how true it is that God does not
show favoritism but accepts men from every nation who fear him and do
what is right. You know the message God sent to the people of Israel,
telling the good news of peace through Jesus Christ, who is Lord of
all. You know what has happened throughout Judea, beginning in Galilee
after the baptism that John preached—how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth
with the Holy Spirit and power, and how he went around doing good and
healing all who were under the power of the devil, because God was with
him.
"We
are witnesses of everything he did in the country of the Jews and in
Jerusalem. They killed him by hanging him on a tree, but God raised him
from the dead on the third day and caused him to be seen. He was not
seen by all the people, but by witnesses whom God had already chosen—by
us who ate and drank with him after he rose from the dead. He commanded
us to preach to the people and to testify that he is the one whom God
appointed as judge of the living and the dead. All the prophets
testify about him that everyone who believes in him receives
forgiveness of sins through his name."
While
Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit came on all who
heard the message. The circumcised believers who had come with Peter
were astonished that the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out
even on the Gentiles. For they heard them speaking in tongues and
praising God.
Then
Peter said, "Can anyone keep these people from being baptized with
water? They have received the Holy Spirit just as we have." So he
ordered that they be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they
asked Peter to stay with them for a few days.
One receives the Holy Spirit when one becomes a believer:
Galatians 3:2-5 I
would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive the Spirit
by observing the law, or by believing what you heard? Are you so
foolish? After beginning with the Spirit, are you now trying to attain
your goal by human effort? Have you suffered so much for nothing—if it
really was for nothing? Does God give you his Spirit and work miracles
among you because you observe the law, or because you believe what you
heard?
But is the gift of the Holy Spirit free?
Galatians 3:14 He
redeemed us in order that the blessing given to Abraham might come to
the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, so that by faith we might receive
the promise of the Spirit.
No, it was paid for, by Jesus.
So,
why did Peter and John place their hands on people in Samaria? Since
the pre-condition for receiving the Holy Spirit is to believe, I would
have to assume that the people in Samaria who were baptized, required
more faith and that Peter and John's prayer during the laying of hands
promoted faith among the people in Samaria who were baptized.
And
what about Peter's speech in Acts 2:38? Again, I'm assuming that faith
is pre-condition for receiving the Holy Spirit and that repenting and
being baptized is an act of faith. June 14 With
all the stuff with which I have to deal (taking of my mom who had a
stroke, taking of my brother who has a chemical imbalance, my
diminished kidney function, my torn ligament on my right shoulder/upper
arm, etc.), just when I thought it couldn't get worse, an extremely
heavy security door at work slammed on my hand, today.
WHY, LORD? How much more do I have to take?
2 Corinthians 12:9 But
he said to me, "My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made
perfect in weakness." Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about
my weaknesses, so that Christ's power may rest on me.
Your
grace is sufficient? What is that supposed to mean? I'm in agony
here! My entire right arm from my shoulder down to my fingers is
throbbing with pain!!!!!
The Lord is right, of course. My body will tolerate the pain and adjust to the limited mobility. Both will diminish in time.
But most importantly, the boundaries of what I thought I can withstand is once again expanded. June 10 There
is another response to "Do we really want Jesus to return?" While the
language, used in this post, is... well... a bit hysterical, the post
raises two important points. Here is the post:
You
are acctually gonna wait for jesus to come back? And what happens when
he does? will you believe it is him? Will you follow Satan to your own
destruction? You need a serious reality check here man. You need to
read the book of revalations. Satan is coming first. And he will try
and trick you into believing he is Jesus. If you follow him there is no
turning back. Why would you listen to fools and think jesus is
returning first? You should never listen to men over gods word. You
need to check this out for yourself. And please don't fall for him.
The first point, that he raises, is that we should not wait for Jesus because Satan is coming first.
The second point, that he raises, is that by waiting for Jesus we would be fooled into following Satan.
Here is my response:
Yes, I am, the Bible tells us to long for His return.
2 Timothy 4:8 Now
there is in store for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord,
the righteous Judge, will award to me on that day—and not only to me,
but also to all who have longed for his appearing.
No,
I will not be deceived by Satan. He can do all the tricks he wants but
he can not do what Jesus will do upon returning: raising us up into
heaven.
1 Thessalonians 4:13:17 Brothers,
we do not want you to be ignorant about those who fall asleep, or to
grieve like the rest of men, who have no hope. We believe that Jesus
died and rose again and so we believe that God will bring with Jesus
those who have fallen asleep in him. According to the Lord's own word,
we tell you that we who are still alive, who are left till the coming
of the Lord, will certainly not precede those who have fallen asleep.
For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command,
with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and
the dead in Christ will rise first. After that, we who are still alive
and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet
the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord forever. Therefore
encourage each other with these words. June 09 Tonight,
while I was browsing through a Christian forum, I encountered two posts
that I found intriguing. One concerns Genesis 1:22 and the other
concerns Mark 11:22-25.
Genesis 1:22 God
blessed them and said, "Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the
water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth."
Here's the first post concerning this verse:
"Be fruitful and multiply."
Just an observation - but we have problems with famine, war, disease, drought, population explosion, etc.
I
believe these problems can all be traced back to the "be fruitful and
multiply" command. But that's just human instinct / nature / as well as
God's command to us as a creation.
OF
COURSE He knew this would result and we would decay or deteriorate as
time goes by, and His provisions are what would keep us safe if we
would all keep them, but apparently - we can't.
So,
what do you think, is Gen 1:22 a command with some deeper meaning to it
(the culmination of it leading to the 2nd coming of Christ and
Armageddon). Creating something that can and will multiply has its
limit and God has a solution for eternal life and preservation and
that's only in the Son and through the Cross.
So, looks kind of bad that we have to face problems but who's to blame?
God commanded us to multiply...
We multiply (some w/out caring what God thinks)...
Now we have problems but we couldn't keep the planet in order. Eh I think we're to blame.
What
am I getting at here... mmmm... that "Be Fruitful And Multiply" is
foreshadowing what we'll be needing before we leave earth - Jesus. :)
Here's my reply:
This
thesis is based on a flawed assumption: It assumes that the world's
major problems are the result of over-population. More particularly,
they resulted from the lack of resources necessary to support the
population.
This assumption is simply not true.
If
one look at how much food is produced and how many people live on
earth, one will see that there is more than enough food for everybody.
The problem is a matter of distribution (or rather the unwillingness to
distribute).
Consider
this: Americans compose of less than 20% (very liberal estimate) of the
world population yet we consume more than 65% (very conservative
estimate) of resources consumed by the world (in dollars).
The main problem is greed not over-population. And that has to do with sin.
Here's the other post:
What do these scriptures mean?
Mark 11:22-25 22"Have[f]
faith in God," Jesus answered. 23"I tell you the truth, if anyone says
to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt
in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be
done for him. 24Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer,
believe that you have received it, and it will be yours. 25And when you
stand praying, if you hold anything against anyone, forgive him, so
that your Father in heaven may forgive you your sins."
Matt 21:22 22If you believe, you will receive whatever you ask for in prayer."
Someone responded with the following:
I
kind of think "Who can honestly ask a mountain to move into the sea
without any doubt"? Because of what we know and what we've experienced,
it's impossible to believe.
For
that reason, I think it means don't pray for stuff outside of what you
believe, because if you doubt you wont receive because you don't really
believe you will. With the measure you use you will be measured (hence
why you should forgive others if you're asking God to forgive you).
But
we shouldn't be limited in prayer forever because of our limited
experience. We should constantly be seeking to grow in our knowledge
and understanding that God can do the impossible if only we would just
ask.
So
yeah, I try not to pray for something I don't believe that God would
do, but I also try to mature and see God can do all things... so
eventually I hope to pray for the impossible knowing full well God can
do it.
Hope that makes sense/is not too heretical :)
Here's my reply:
huh?
Are you saying that we should only pray for things that we know would happen?
So
if someone is on a ledge on a mountain and you see an avalanche coming
towards this person and you know that the only way this can end is this
person being creamed by the avalanche, you would pray that this person
be creamed by the avalanche?
OK, let's start with the first verse:
"Have faith in God, " Jesus answered.
That's the main point of the passage: Have faith in God.
It, of course, begs the question: "Have faith in God to do what?"
The implicit answer is: To do what He promises to do.
So,
if the Lord asks you to cause the mountain to crumb to the sea by
saying to the mountain, "Go, throw yourself into the sea", have faith
in the Lord and do it while believing the mountain would crumb to the
sea.
For
example, the Lord told the Israelites to march around Jericho, blowing
trumpets and yelling; then, the wall would crumble. The Israelites did
it while believing that the walls would crumble. And because they
believed, the wall crumbled.
Mark 11:25 And
when you stand praying, if you hold anything against anyone, forgive
him, so that your Father in heaven may forgive you your sins.
The last sentence is a qualification of "receiving whatever you ask".
God promises that you'd be forgiven if you ask for forgiveness.
However, for this special case, just asking is not enough.
To receive forgiveness, you must not only ask for forgiveness, you must also give it. June 07 There
were two notable responses to "Do we really want Jesus to return?".
One was an objection to what my original post implies and the other was
a personal reflection.
Here is the objection:
This
type of thinking drives me nuts, especially since I come from a
tradition that has bought into it hook, line, and sinker. Absolutely,
we must take the Gospel to all peoples in the world, but if our
motivation in doing so is to somehow force Christ to return, we are
missing the boat. Back before WWII, they thought that through working
for social justice, they could create Heaven on earth and thereby force
the Second Coming. Hence, all of the parachurch organizations that
started in the late 1800's and early 1900's. They were wrong, and I
truly believe that this new approach is wrong as well. Again, we must
evangelize, but our motivation needs to be pure in doing so.
Here's my response to the objection:
It was never about forcing Jesus to come. And no where in my post was there the mentioning of creating a heaven on earth.
It is about Jesus waiting for us help complete the task of fulfilling the Great Commission.
The
problem that I am pointing out is that a lot of Christians sit around
speculating on date and time of Jesus' return and NOT participating in
the Great Commission.
That's
why I quoted from Acts 1:6-8. The disciples are all excited about
finding out when Jesus would establish His kingdom. To which, Jesus
reply "It is not for you to know the times or dates the Father has set
by his own authority... be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea
and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth".
Jesus
has already instructed them (in Matthew 24:14) that "this gospel of the
kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all
nations, and then the end will come."
So,
Jesus was basically telling the disciples, stop wasting your time
concerning yourself with when the end would come. It is not for you to
know. Concern yourself with doing what you are called to do: fulfilling
the condition that God had set. The end would not come until that
condition is fulfilled.
This post is about yielding to Jesus' call and not just sit around and speculate on the date and time of His return.
Here is the response to my response to the objection:
You
may not have explicitly stated it, but the implication is definitely
there: "We can affect the time of Christ's return through our actions."
I then mentioned the Social Gospel movement as an example of this type
of thought. They were wrong then, and those who think that we can
affect the date of Christ's return through mass evangelism are wrong
now.
Absolutely
we must reach out to those who have never heard, but there are many
(not you, perhaps) who seem to think that the moment a group of people
from the last unreached people group accepts Christ, He will return.
This type of cause and effect thinking is rather dangerous, but it
seems to be growing in prominence. This may not have been what you
meant to say with your post, but the message is there. We must be very
careful in how we think, say, and write. I applaud the message quoted
above, and, if you had posted that message with that Scripture alone,
there would have been no mixed signals.
My final response to the objection:
I
stated that a condition must be met before Christ return. I did not
state that meeting the condition would invoke Christ to return. To draw
that conclusion would be an application of flawed logic.
e.g.,
There must be sufficient oxygen in the atmosphere before a fire can be
started. It DOES NOT mean that as soon as there is sufficient oxygen in
the atmosphere there would be fire.
It DOES mean that there WOULD NEVER BE fire as long as there is insufficient oxygen.
Like wise, Christ WOULD NOT return before there are believers among all the nations.
I'm simply urging the fulfillment of that precursor condition.
I
believe that we agree on this issue. Our only disagreement is in how it
is communicated. For some reason you believe that my statement imply
that the fulfillment of that condition would force the return of Christ.
I
wanted to post the response with the personal reflection because I
believe there are many that share this sentiment. Here is the response:
Heck
yeh I want Jesus to return to bring forth a new world without
suffering, corruption, sin, rape, murder, etc.. put an end to the chaos.
However, I want to be ready When He comes back I do not to be in sin or struggling with the same strong hold sins.
I looking forward to the savior coming back.
I like the message and I do want to get involved.
Here's my response:
LOL!
I hope He doesn't wait until you are not in sin and not struggling with
sin before coming back. Then, He'd never come back because none of us
would ever reach that state.
1 Corinthians 15:51-53 Behold, I show you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, In
a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the
trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we
shall be changed. For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.
Luckily, we will all be changed (perfected) when He returns.
Yes, we are to pursue becoming more like Him. However, we do so by yielding to His call.
We sin because we lack the faith that He would provide for us and we grab whatever we think we need or want for ourselves.
It is by getting to know Him in which our faith is built up.
He does not need us to reach the world. He can do it Himself.
He invites us to participate in this activity with Him so that we would walk more closely with Him and get to know him.
Knowing Him more results in having faith in Him more.
Having
faith in him more results in we not being as desperate and grabbing
whatever we think we need or want for ourselves. Thus, we sin less.
Haven't you noticed that the ones, who throw themselves into following His call, mature much more quickly?
The cause and effect is: following His call yields maturity; not the other way around.
Actually,
it's more like a chicken or egg cyclic process. Following His call
yields greater maturity which yields more following His which yields
greater maturity, etc.
However, the initial bootstrap step is following His call.
One
can not obtain spiritual maturity on one's own; one can study on one's
own to get a lot of head knowledge but that's not the same as spiritual
maturity. June 05 Someone posted the following in a Christian forum:
Here
is a question and if you can answer it with a logical answer other than
"because God says so in Leviticus", then I might agree. But why is
homosexuality wrong? What makes it so wrong in the eyes of God? Why is
it wrong? Why does God say it's wrong?
If you can answer that without saying, "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable." -Leviticus 18:22
Here's my answer:
Think
of the universe as a masterpiece art created by God. Part of this
masterpiece is the creation of a man and a woman (a husband and his
wife). That relationship was created to represent God's (Jesus')
relationship with the church.
Ephesians 5:25-27 Husbands,
love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up
for her to make her holy, cleansing her by the washing with water
through the word, and to present her to himself as a radiant church,
without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless.
You'll
find that analogy in many other places in the Bible (Old and New
Testament), starting with Genesis "Let us make man in our own image."
to many of the Psalms to the "Solomon's Song of Songs"... etc.
For
man to have homosexual relationships would be a rejection of God's
purpose of using the husband/wife relationship as the image of God's
relationship with His people. June 01 As
I browse the Christian forums, I continually find discussions
speculating on when the end will come. God does not want us to know the
times or date of Jesus' second coming. Jesus tells us the condition
("gospel must first be preached to all nations") and wants us to work
towards that condition.
Acts 1:6-8 So when they met together, they asked him, "Lord, are you at this time going to restore the kingdom to Israel?" He
said to them: "It is not for you to know the times or dates the Father
has set by his own authority. But you will receive power when the Holy
Spirit comes on you; and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in
all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth."
Mark 13:10 And the gospel must first be preached to all nations.
Matthew
24:14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole
world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.
Matthew 28:19-20 Therefore
go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the
Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey
everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to
the very end of the age."
Why? Because in the end, there would be saved people from all nations in heaven:
Revelation 7:9-12 After
this I looked and there before me was a great multitude that no one
could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing
before the throne and in front of the Lamb. They were wearing white
robes and were holding palm branches in their hands. And they cried out
in a loud voice:
"Salvation belongs to our God, who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb."
All
the angels were standing around the throne and around the elders and
the four living creatures. They fell down on their faces before the
throne and worshiped God, saying:
"Amen! Praise and glory and wisdom and thanks and honor and power and strength be to our God for ever and ever. Amen!"
In
the bible verses, mentioned above, the word "nation" is translated from
the Greek word "ethnos" (Strong's G1484) which means race or "people
group". The Jews people today use the word "Gentiles".
The "people groups" or Gentiles are identified in Genesis 10 (The Table of Nations).
According
U.S. Center for World Mission, the number of unreached "people groups"
(those without a viable indigenous church) are dwindling. We are very
close.
If
we truly love Christ and want Him to return, we would all be putting
most of our resources into making this condition happen, helping to
bring the Gospel to the last of the unreached "people groups".
Long
ago, someone noted that I do not have a picture of Jesus on my wall and
gave me a painting of Jesus. The reason that I didn't have a picture
of Jesus is because no one knows what Jesus looked like so any picture
of Jesus would be a misrepresentation of who Jesus is. However, not
wanting to upset the donor of this painting, I accepted it and place in
over my piano in my living room.
Recently,
someone noticed that picture of Jesus over my piano in my living room
and tried to persuade me that having a picture of Jesus was a violation
of God's commandments. While I don't believe that it is a violation, I
took it down for this person's sake. (The donor of this picture had
since moved to California so it would not upset this person if the
painting is no longer over my piano since this person would not be here
to see it.)
I
was going to let this topic drop and not bother to write about it in my
blog, but the following post appeared in one of the Christian forums:
Isn't a painting of Jesus a 'graven image?'
Someone else posted this response:
According
to 1 Corinthians 8:4-6 I would say no. This scripture says there is but
one God but many have made gods that are in the heavens or earth. Our
worship is given to God and Jesus. I'll take my chances with a
painting of the One who died for me. I know what Exodus 20:4-6 says and
it is complimentary of the 1 Corinthians scripture. Just my belief.
This is my response:
While
I agree that having a picture of Jesus does not constitute the
violation of the God's commandment (since it is referring to worshiping
idols), one has to also consider how one's action can effect the
spiritual health of others.
1 Corinthians 10:23-24 "Everything
is permissible"—but not everything is beneficial. "Everything is
permissible"—but not everything is constructive. Nobody should seek his
own good, but the good of others.
Romans 14:19-21 Let
us therefore make every effort to do what leads to peace and to mutual
edification. Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food. All
food is clean, but it is wrong for a man to eat anything that causes
someone else to stumble. It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or
to do anything else that will cause your brother to fall.
While
these to verses refer to keeping kosher, it can also be applied to
other ways in which we can cause others to stumble even though we are
doing something that is permissible.
Let's
assume that you hang an image of a Caucasian Jesus and it causes
someone of African origin to subliminally categorize Christianity as an
European religion, would you not be causing someone to stumble while
doing something that is permissible?
Let us not just be legalists; let us conduct ourselves with love.
|